I'm reading a book. This is not a pre-view, because I've already started reading it. It's not a re-view, because I haven't finished reading it. It's just a view. Let's get on with it.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
Robert Pirsig
So I've been in the process of reading this book for the past 2 years. Damon lent it to me, knowing my interest in philosophy and my perusal of a similarly themed book called
Zen Guitar. I had difficulty getting through Zen Guitar because it lacked back story. It was like trying to read the
Tao Te Ching. All that heavy Eastern philosophy without a thread to keep me engaged.
This book has a biographical story weaved into its philosophical meanderings. The basic story is one of a father and son going out for a cross-country motorcycle ride. Along the way, the father (the narrator) launches into a
chautauqua about the state of the world today regarding our disconnect with technology.
The idea and philosophy he constructs is really a bit esoteric for the non-philosophically minded. Having an undergraduate degree in philosophy, I rather enjoy it. But what I think gives this book some wider appeal is the variety of subject matter the narrator incorporates into the story. There have been so many interesting points to ponder along the way -- that's why it's taken me so long to get through this thing. I'm currently on yet another break from reading the book, partially because I'm now back doing work all day long, but also because I was starting to become a bit overwhelmed with the subject material.
For example, there is the mention of the early days of the theory of relativity. For years, science had built a "Gilded Age" in which people thought that all the answers would eventually be outlined in hard scientific laws. Then, some mathematicians, in an effort to prove
Euclid's fifth postulate -- which was equivalent to the
parallel postulate which states that
Given any straight line and a point not on it, there "exists one and only one straight line which passes" through that point and never intersects the first line, no matter how far they are extended.
--from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ParallelPostulate.html
This seems rather self-evident to those of us who took geometry in high-school, yeah? Well, people had been trying to prove it for centuries without avail. So these two mathematicians, Bolyai and Lobachevsky, independently tried to prove the postulate by disproving its opposite. That is to say, if they reversed this postulate and assumed that two lines could pass through the same point and still be considered parallel, the whole of geometry would collapse due to logical contradictions. The problem? They found no inconsistencies. Essentially, they found an entirely new kind of geometry, now called
Non-Euclidean Geometry.
All of this mind-blowing material is something I've recently read, which is really but a side-road from the main point the author seeks to make, and the book is riddled with them. But I feel smarter and more enlightened to be exposed to this. I was completely reeling trying to take in the idea of Non-Euclidean Geometry. I still am, actually.
At any rate, I do recommend reading this book if you're looking for some reading material that will make you feel smarter without your have to feel like you're studying or memorizing stuff. Along that line, I'd also recommend the Dan Brown books
The Da Vinci Code and
Angels and Demons, which are apparently popular with a lot of people. I liked them because they also made me feel smarter by educating me about a host of heretofore unknown facts or theories at least.
It is super late, and I need to be at work at 7:15 in the morning (we're cutting some dude's neck open). So goodnight.